In 1966, a book by Mark Lane about the John F. Kennedy assassination, Rush to Judgment, appeared. The book was critical of conclusions reached by the Warren Commission and suggested there was a conspiracy behind the assassination of JFK.
On December 14, 2012, in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook incident, a similar Rush to Judgment began to be seen. Few hard facts were reported; instead the “news” relied upon emotion. Tugging at the heart of the public rather than its head, the “news” led its followers down the path to hysteria.
It is unthinkable that an autopsy would not have been performed on the remains of the alleged killer, Adam Lanza. Yet we do not know for certain at this point whether or not an autopsy on Lanza has been done! I can find no reports anywhere regarding a Lanza autopsy. Have any of the so-called “news” people bothered to ask? Even if comment on a Lanza autopsy was refused, at least we would have a report somewhere about Chief So-and-so refused to comment, when asked, whether an autopsy on Adam Lanza had been performed.
To make this really simple for so-called “news” persons, let me spell it out for you: A-d-a-m L-a-n-z-a A-u-t-o-p-s-y.
Results from an autopsy done on the remains of alleged killer Adam Lanza could tell us if any drugs, prescription or otherwise, were in his body when he died. If traces of any prescription drugs were found, that could help lead us to the person who had prescribed the drugs. We would also know exactly what specific drugs, if any, had been prescribed for Adam Lanza.
We have been informed by the “news” that Adam Lanza was “found dead” at Sandy Hook. How did Adam Lanza die? Did he have a heart attack? Did he hang himself? Or did Adam Lanza die from a bullet or bullets? An autopsy done on the remains of alleged killer Adam Lanza could tell us the exact cause of death. (UPDATE: AP now says “new details emerge.” The passive “emergence” of the “new details” includes that Adam Lanza “used a handgun to commit suicide.”)
If results from an autopsy done on the remains of alleged killer Adam Lanza showed he had died due to being shot, we might also know whether Lanza had been shot by a rifle or by a pistol. We quickly learned that the mother of the alleged killer, Nancy Lanza, was shot four times in the face at close range “with the gun she trained him [Adam Lanza] to use”, according to the British “Mail Online” publication. But as to how Adam Lanza actually died, all we had gotten until just now from extremely massive “news” coverage was that he had been “found dead.”
Since death had been by pistol shot (as has now “emerged” passively to AP), this would likely have left powder burns. Does the Adam Lanza autopsy show any such powder burns? We don’t know, because, after all, we don’t really know if an autopsy has even been performed on the remains of alleged killer Adam Lanza.
A paraffin test done on Lee Harvey Oswald, alleged “lone nut” killer of President John F. Kennedy, showed gunpowder residue on his hands, but not on Oswald’s right cheek. Since shooting a rifle should have exposed his right cheek to gunpowder, the negative reaction is often cited as evidence that Oswald did not fire a rifle. As to the gunpowder residue on his hands, Oswald had frequently gone to the Sports Drome Rifle Range in Dallas for target practice.
An autopsy done on the remains of alleged killer Adam Lanza might likewise tell us whether or not Lanza had even fired a pistol or rifle recently. As witnesses had pointed to shots from the “grassy knoll” in Dallas, so too there have been reports out of the Sandy Hook incident of a “second gunman.”
As of December 21, 2012 the British “Mail Online” publication reports that the body of Nancy Lanza has been claimed and released for burial. But the authorities “have not said” whether or not Adam Lanza’s body has been claimed. The body of Adam Lanza is in itself important evidence. Let us hope an autopsy has been performed by now, as Adam Lanza’s body lies in Limbo, waiting to be claimed.