Just prior to [Hurricane] Katrina hitting the Gulf, [Vladimir] Putin noted that two U.S. Senators were in Russia snooping around off- limits secret facilities. That is U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D., Ill.) originally from the former British colony of Kenya and a year previous, before Obama was elected, was publicly fingered by me as a British spy; and his accomplice in Russia, U.S. Senator Richard Lugar (R., Ind.). Thus wrote the late Sherman H. Skolnick on September 6, 2005, in part 80 of his series, “Overthrow of the American Republic”.
On January 19, 2009, I was honored to be the guest on Rumor Mill News radio. On that broadcast we discussed many things including questions about the true bloodline of Abraham Lincoln. William Herndon, in his biography of his friend Lincoln, mentioned some secret about the parentage of Abe Lincoln. In the radio discussion, it could not be helped but to see a possible tie-in with the then newly-elected Barack Obama and Lincoln. Already, even in early 2009, some were questioning who Barack Obama really was. In that radio broadcast, there was even speculation that Barack Obama might be a “Manchurian Candidate.”
In 1962, a movie starring Frank Sinatra, The Manchurian Candidate, was released at the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Directed by John Frankenheimer, the film suggested a Communist plot to install a Red as U.S. President. The term “Manchurian Candidate” has since come to mean a president under the control of a foreign power. If Sherman Skolnick was correct, this would mean President Barack Obama is loyal primarily to Britain and not the United States.
There is a reason the U.S. Constitution stipulates the U.S. President must be a native born American. Someone secretly born in Kenya would not qualify for the office. Only someone born in the U.S. would have that extra safeguard of loyalty.
What if President Barack Obama had been secretly born in Kenya and was a “Manchurian Candidate” agent of Britain? That would mean Barack Obama would tend to follow British orders regarding, for example, foreign policy as to Syria.
The controversial Lyndon Larouche organization has claimed there is a Saudi-British pact, and that this can explain recent events in the Middle East. We know that the Saudis are pushing for the overthrow of the Bashar Assad government in Syria. British propaganda against the Assad government has also been intense. Which brings us to the case of Barack Obama and the “red line.”
Controversial radio host Rush Limbaugh had been sitting on the fence last week. He seemed to be avoiding the Syrian crisis subject which had erupted following the alleged full moon gas attack of August 21, 2013. But on Friday, August 30, 2013, when John “Lurch” Kerry, U.S. Secretary of State, began making pronouncements, Limbaugh had a fit regarding Kerry’s hypocrisy.
After the Kerry pronouncements it so happened that Barack Obama took a walk in the garden. And the Lord did speak unto Barack. And the Lord did say, “Barack, thou must seek congressional approval.”
Rush Limbaugh was definitely off the fence in the first hour of his broadcast of September 3, 2013. A transcript entitled, “Bodansky: What If Bashar Didn’t Do It?” raises serious (Syrius) questions. Yossef Bodansky, an Israeli-American political scientist who served as Director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare of the US House of Representatives from 1988 to 2004 had penned a scholarly article suggesting it had been Al-Qaeda and Company, not the Bashar Assad government, who were responsible for the August 21st alleged gas attack.
“The conventional wisdom is that it’s Bashar, it’s a fait accompli, but I’m telling you,” stated Limbaugh, “since last September, for anybody keeping track, wanting to remain open-minded about this, it’s an open question whether the rebels got their hands on some chemical weapons, and then, while in the process of getting the heck kicked out of ’em, which Bashar was doing, they launched chemical weapons on their own people, framing Bashar.”
Especially significant is that Rush Limbaugh, love him or hate him, is listened to by millions of Americans. On September 3rd, these millions of Americans heard the propaganda line on Syria seriously questioned.
Bodansky’s report, “Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attack?”, is available on Internet. Foreknowledge by the Washington government about the August 21st incident is alleged. Bodansky reports that on August 13-14, 2013 the so-called “Free Syrian Army” had been briefed about “a war-changing development” which would, in turn, lead to a US-led bombing of Syria.
Foreknowledge by the Barack Obama “Manchurian Candidate” administration about the “red line” to be crossed on August 21st? Gearing up of the anti-Assad mercenaries so they could take advantage of and coordinate with U.S. missile attacks? That’s what is being alleged.