Walt Disney and the UFOs

On July 19th and 20th 1952 there were multiple sightings of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) in the Washington, DC area.

The deep levels of the bureaucracy took the situation seriously, even though it was played down in public. Commander Randall Boyd of Air Intelligence went so far as to privately say it was not entirely impossible that the objects might be from another planet.

By December 2, 1952, CIA assistant director H. Marshall Chadwell had prepared a list of recommendations for the National Security Council (NSC). From these recommendations was born the Robertson Panel. A crack team of scientists, technicians, intel spooks, and military people concluded the real concern was that the UFO subject could be used by foreign powers to psychologically manipulate the American public. In defense against such a psychological enemy attack, the Robertson Panel recommended “a public education campaign should be undertaken” on UFO matters.

The Panel offered suggestions for who might be enlisted into the mass communications public “education” campaign. Among the names suggested were Arthur Godfrey, the Jam Handy Company, and Walt Disney, Inc.

Ward Kimball, a valued member of the Walt Disney team, had developed animations of the Cheshire Cat and the Mad Hatter. In 1979, Kimball revealed that Disney had been working not only with the CIA on the UFO subject, but with the Air Force as well. “The [Walt Disney] studio began work on the requested UFO documentary; animators were asked to imagine what an alien would look like; while Walt Disney himself eagerly waited for the Air Force to deliver [a] promised film of actual UFOs.”

(Source: “Walt Disney and the CIA: A Secret Connection”. From, Secret History, by Nick Redfern. Canton, MI: Visible Ink Press, 2015.)

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Deep Shakespeare (Part 3)

The Jesuits managed to penetrate Sir Walter Raleigh’s secret Round Table of poets and wits. The gatherings came to be branded, due to Jesuit penetration, “a school of Atheism.” “And it was through such agencies, that his [Raleigh’s] enemies at court were able to sow suspicion in [Queen] Elizabeth’s mind…” Profane anagrams were being inculcated!, Elizabeth was advised. [1]

Raleigh, through his secret Round Table, may have even been attempting a subversive state within the state. And plays containing subversive subtext may have been among its weaponry. Terms employed in their mode of communication “were not in the more obvious interpretation of them actionable, and to a vulgar, unlearned, or stupid conceit, could hardly be made to appear so.” [1]

“It is not too much to say, that the works of Raleigh and [Francis] Bacon, and others whose connection with it it is not necessary to specify just here, are written throughout in the language of this school.” [1] It was the Raleigh Round Table school, the Invisible College.

The Fraternity of the Rosie Cross, in other words the Rosicrucians, called themselves Invisibles. The word “college” is from the old word collegium, meaning a society. The Rosicrucians were therefore an Invisible College. And the heyday of Rosicrucianism (not to be confused with later imitators) coincides with the life and death of Francis Bacon. The “entire rise of Rosicrucianism and the noise it made, commences early in the seventeenth century and expires about 1630, four years after Bacon’s death.” [2]

And what does the second of the Rosicrucian documents, the Confessio Fraternitatis, which mysteriously appeared in 1615, have to say? Chapter 12 of the Confessio warns of those who “deceive men with monstrous symbols and enigmas” or who “profit by the curiosity of the credulous; our age doth produce many such, one of the greatest being a stage-player, a man with sufficient ingenuity for imposition…” [3]

…our age doth produce many such, one of the greatest being a stage-player, a man with sufficient ingenuity for imposition… (Confessio Fraternitatis)

Might not the stage-player imposter have been “Stratford Willy”, a.k.a. Shakespeare? Francis Bacon belonged to a secret society honoring Pallas Athena. And Pallas Athena was routinely referred to as “the spear shaker.”

——- Sources ——-
[1] The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakespeare Unfolded, by Delia Bacon. London: Groombridge and Sons, 1857.
[2] Bacon, Shakespeare and the Rosicrucians, by W.F.C. Wigston. Republished by Kessinger.net
[3] The Real History of the Rosicrucians, by Arthur Edward Waite. London: George Redway, 1887. Republished 2005 by Elibron Classics.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Deep Shakespeare (Part 2)

It was Delia Bacon who first penetrated the secrets of the “Shakespeare” plays, gradually between 1845 and 1857. Delia pierced the “Shakespeare” veil, and she had a romance with Alexander MacWhorter, who probed into the mystery of the Cardiff Giant. (Background: Deep Shakespeare, Ersjdamoo’s Blog, August 25, 2018.)

The unfolding begins with Sir Walter Raleigh.

There was work at home for Sir Walter Raleigh. In England itself there were enemies more formidable than the Spaniard. Raleigh faced an enemy which required a subtle strategy.

Not widely realized is that Raleigh was a scholar and a man of letters. Nay! He was an Originator and the Founder of a School.

Raleigh carried his trunk of books with him in all his adventurous voyages. “He studied them in the ocean-storm; he studied them in his tent, as Brutus studied in his.”

Raleigh rose to become the center of a circle of wits and poets of the Elizabethan age, such persons as Sir Philip Sidney, Henry Lord Paget, and Edward Earl of Oxford. Raleigh, the bold adventurer, “flashed new life into that little nucleus of the Elizabethan development.”

The little Round Table of wits and poets “grew rounder with this knight’s presence.” Over the dead letters of the past came a fresh Atlantic breeze, a New Atlantis. Universality, the motto of these knights, was symbolized by The Globe.

Raleigh’s Round Table with its new poetic and philosophic ideas needed a way to evade the restrictions of the time. They found it in the English Play. Their first attempts were rather clumsy, but this was just “the tuning of the instruments, that those who came afterwards might play the better.”

The influence of Raleigh upon his time cannot yet be fully estimated; because, in the first place, it was primarily of that kind which escapes, from its subtlety, the ordinary historical record; and, in the second place, it was an influence at the time necessarily covert, studiously disguised.

Raleigh’s plan for a Great Instauration was passed on to an ardent pupil: Francis Bacon. Other of the choicest youth of the age also imbibed Raleigh’s wisdom. But the new doctrine needed “to be clothed in a language of its own, whose inner meaning only those who had found their way to its inmost shrine were able to interpret.”

“The fact that such an Association existed, that it began with Raleigh, that young men of distinction were attracted to it, and that in such numbers, and under such conditions, that it came to be considered ultimately as a ‘School,’ of which he was the head-master – the fact that the new experimental science was supposed to have had its origin in this association, – that opinions, differing from the received ones, were also secretly discussed in it, – that anagrams and other devices were made use of for the purpose of infolding the esoteric doctrines of the school in popular language, so that it was possible to write in this language acceptably to the vulgar, and without violating preconceived opinions, and at the same time instructively to the initiated, – all this remains, even on the surface of statements already accessible to any scholar, – all this remains, either in the form of contemporary documents, or in the recollections of persons who have apparently had it from the most authentic sources, from persons who profess to know, and who were at least in a position to know, that such was the impression at the time.”

(Source: The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakespeare Unfolded, by Delia Bacon. London: Groombridge and Sons, 1857.)

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Deep Shakespeare

Have we been tricked for four centuries? The video hopefully viewable above suggests Francis Bacon as the true author of the “Shakespeare” plays. In fact, Bacon was the leader of a team of “good pens” and is not solely responsible for the immortal plays.

(For background, go to Ersjdamoo’s Blog and do a search there on “Esoteric Shakespeare”.)

As nearly as I can trace, it was Delia Bacon who first penetrated the secrets of the “Shakespeare” plays, gradually between 1845 and 1857. Notably, she had a romance with one Alexander MacWhorter, and he, in turn, is connected with the mystery of the Cardiff Giant. See, for further background, Tammuz and the Mound Builders at my blog. Upon the right arm of the “statue” (Cardiff Giant) discovered in Onondaga County, New York in October 1869, noticed Professor Alexander MacWhorter of the Yale Divinity School, “midway between the elbow and the shoulder, is the following inscription in Phoenician alphabetical characters: Lord Tammuz Of The Heavens: The Baal.” [1])

(Other searches at my blog on “Alexander MacWhorter” will yield many relevant entries.)

So Delia Bacon first pierced the “Shakespeare” veil, and she had a romance with Alexander MacWhorter, who probed into the mystery of the Cardiff Giant.

After years of study, Delia Bacon’s book, The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakespeare Unfolded, was published in 1857. That book contains a Preface by no less than Nathaniel Hawthorne, author of The Scarlet Letter and other great classics. In his Preface, Hawthorne quotes from a manuscript by Delia Bacon “not intended for present publication”:

The great secret of the Elizabethan age did not lie where any superficial research could ever have discovered it. It was not left within the range of any accidental disclosure. It did not lie on the surface of any Elizabethan document… The great secret of the Elizabethan Age was inextricably reserved by the founders of a new learning… [The veiled truths] should test the mind of the discoverer… [These] were presented to the world in the form of An Enigma. It was a form well fitted to divert inquiry, and baffle even the research of the scholar for a time… [The solution] waited for the reader who would observe, at last, those thick-strewn scientific clues, those thick-crowding enigmas, those perpetual beckonings from the ‘theatre’ into the judicial palace of the mind.

——- Sources ——-
[1] “Tammuz and the Mound Builders”, Ersjdamoo’s Blog, August 19, 2012. https://ersjdamoo.wordpress.com/2012/08/19/tammuz-and-the-mound-builders/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

In New Rome

“In new Rome there walked three men, a Judas, a Brutus and a spy,” wrote Union counter-intelligence chief Colonel Lafayette Baker in secret coded messages.

“New Rome” meant Washington, DC. (Background: Who Will Guard the Guards?, Ersjdamoo’s Blog, August 13, 2018.)

In new Rome there walked three men, a Judas, a Brutus and a spy. Each planned that he should be the king when Abraham should die. One trusted not the other but they went on for that day, waiting for that final moment when, with pistol in his hand, one of the sons of Brutus could sneak behind that cursed man and put a bullet in his brain and lay his clumsey [sic] corpse away. As the fallen man lay dying, Judas came and paid respects to one he hated, and when at last he saw him die, he said, “Now the ages have him and the nation now have I.” But, alas, fate would have it Judas slowly fell from grace, and with him went Brutus down to their proper place. But lest one is left to wonder what happened to the spy, I can safely tell you this, it was I. (Col. Lafayette Baker [1])

In Old Rome, the Gracchi had relied on random mobs to help further their political agenda. But Publius Sulpicius Rufus, Tribune of the plebs in 88 B.C., “advanced” Roman politics by his invention of the professional street gang. [2] This is like what we have now with Antifa.

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, though, one-upped Sulpicious. Sulla took a Roman legion and marched right into Rome. Why was Sulla marching right into Rome? “To deliver her from tyrants,” he said. [2] Sulla was “draining the swamp,” so to speak.

Sulla declared 12 men in Rome to be “Enemies of the State.” At the top of the list was Sulpicius. He and the other 11 were “outlawed”, meaning they were no longer protected by Roman law and anyone might murder them with impunity. You can bet that Sulpicious tried to skedaddle out of town. But that didn’t help Sulpicius in the end: within a day, Sulpicius was betrayed by a slave and executed. [2]

After Sulla had “drained the swamp”, he turned his army around and marched out of Rome. [2]

Which brings us to President Donald Trump’s planned military parade in New Rome (Washington, DC). The last such parade I can recall was at the end of the Civil War, when the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) marched right into New Rome. You could say that maybe Trump was like Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, wanting to march an army right into Rome. Unfortunately, Trump’s Sulla II military parade got cancelled due to a bunch of bureaucrats in New Rome. If only Sulpicius had known the trick of red tape back in the old Roman times, he too might have prevented an army marching into the Eternal City.

——- Sources ——-
[1] Anatomy of an Assassination, by John Cottrell. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1966.
[2] The Storm Before the Storm: The Beginning of the End of the Roman Republic, by Mike Duncan. New York: Hachette Book Group, 2017.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

This Lunar Phase

In New Moon Of Strzok, Ersjdamoo’s Blog saw the “new development” signified by the New Moon of August 11th as the firing of FBI agent Peter Strzok. A new phase had begun, with Strzok as the leading edge. [1]

Next in this lunar phase came the revocation of security clearance for John Brennan, former CIA Director. [2]

The Forces of Trump were on the rise. But then, with the approaching Full Moon of Sunday August 26th, came the counter-attack from the Forces of Hillary. Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was convicted of eight felony counts. Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to eight felony counts. Republican Congressman Duncan Hunter Jr. was indicted on multiple counts of campaign finance violations and fraud. Republican Congressman Chris Collins was indicted on charges of securities fraud and insider trading. [3]

“US political warfare intensifies” opines the World Socialist Web Site. In a way that is what’s underlying this lunar phase, though the WSWS analysis is a bit simplistic: the Forces of Trump do not only represent a faction of the Establishment, as WSWS analyzes, but millions of ordinary Americans. For WSWS to see the Forces of Trump as a faction of the Establishment even seems a tad ridiculous, since the Establishment is obviously mostly arrayed against President Donald Trump. [3]

To keep your cool and not flip out with all this, consider the Gracchi brothers of ancient Rome. Gaius Sempronius Gracchus and Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus were the John F. and Robert Kennedys of around 130 B.C. Like JFK and RFK the Gracchi brothers were both assassinated. So this gives us a timeline for where we are now: Gracchi brothers (circa 130 BC); Kennedy brothers (1960s). To see what comes next and what is to come, read The Storm Before the Storm, by Mike Duncan.

——- Sources ——-
[1] “New Moon Of Strzok”, Ersjdamoo’s Blog, August 15, 2018. https://ersjdamoo.wordpress.com/2018/08/15/new-moon-of-strzok/
[2] “CIA Brennan Battles Boris and Natasha”, Ersjdamoo’s Blog, August 19, 2018. https://ersjdamoo.wordpress.com/2018/08/19/cia-brennan-battles-boris-and-natasha/
[3] “US political warfare intensifies after Cohen plea, Manafort conviction”, by Patrick Martin. World Socialist Web Site, August 23, 2018. http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/08/23/trum-a23.html

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CIA Brennan Battles Boris and Natasha

John Brennan, former CIA Director, links with Douglas Bennet, a former top State Department official with CIA connections. Two of Bennet’s sons, James Bennet and Democratic Senator Michael Bennet, branch off from the paterfamilias. James Bennet, editorial page editor for The New York Times, turned over space in that newspaper to CIA Brennan on Friday, August 17, 2018. [1]

In the Friday column, CIA Brennan reportedly presented “a massive conspiracy theory” involving Russia as a Boris Badenov super-villain. [1]

But who is “Fearless Leader”? We are left to intuit it is either Vladimir Putin or Donald Trump.

And who is Natasha Fatale? She was the partner of Boris Badenov in the old Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoons. Is Natasha Melania Trump, or Hillary Clinton?

Earlier, CIA Brennan had overseen efforts to block a Senate investigation into CIA torture, including by spying on Senate staff members conducting the investigation. [1]

To fight back against Boris and Natasha, and the dastardly plot of Fearless Leader, “censorship measures employed by social media and Internet companies have been vastly expanded.” CIA Brennan explains that Western democracies “present an especially inviting target, as a variety of politicians, political parties, media outlets, think tanks and influencers are readily manipulated, wittingly and unwittingly, or even bought outright by Russian intelligence operatives.” [1]

But, says the World Socialist Web Site, possible Bullwinkle, “The source of this unprecedented attack on free speech lies not in Russia, but in the United States.” The previous authority of the professional gatekeepers has been undermined by social media platforms and alternative sources of news. [1] In other words, CIA Brennan is a REACTIONARY, representing reactionary forces. The professional gatekeepers are on the run and so have concocted a “false flag” Boris and Natasha theory to justify a crackdown on homegrown dissent grown too powerful due to Gutenberg’s newest incarnation.

——- Sources ——-
[1] “Former CIA Director John Brennan’s brief for dismantling democracy”, by Joseph Kishore. World Socialist Web Site, August 18, 2018. http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/08/18/pers-a18.html

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment